It works like this:
freight forwarders get paid by overseas buyers to transport
shipments from sellers in other countries. In the process,
freight forwarders often create the documents that are required
by financial instruments that transfer funds from the buyer
back to the seller in exchange for the goods. Called Letters
of Credit, or LCs, these instruments mitigate the importer's
credit risk by substituting the creditworthiness of a foreign
bank or other financial institution. In effect, exporters
often use LCs to minimize their risk of nonpayment by an overseas
buyer—that is, to retain some control over payment.
If the LCs were always letter-perfect, exporters would get
paid (at least in theory) not long after the goods land on
the buyer's dock. But most of the time, these documents are
far from perfect. That's because the freight forwarders, who
create the documents, have little incentive to issue perfect
documents. After all, the forwarders get paid by buyers, who
benefit from payment delays.
But banks won't release their funds to the seller unless they
receive documents that are letter-perfect. Even inconsequential
discrepancies, like a misspelled first name or a day's difference
in a date, can tie up payment for a shipment worth hundreds
of thousands of dollars. All this time, the bank earns interest
on the payment they're holding. And even a few days worth
of interest on a payment can be substantial.
Once a bank rejects a letter of credit because of errors—which
happens 70 percent of the time—the burden then falls
on the seller of the goods to correct and resubmit the documents
quickly. And although the exporter might be a world leader
in manufacturing semiconductors, or wireless phones, or computers,
they're probably not international financiers. The time, stamina,
and specialized expertise required for a business to get an
export payment released from a powerful financial institution—especially
a foreign one—can drain the enterprise¹s resources
for days, and often weeks.
|
|